This report is based on information from February 2017. The information is presented in three key categories: safety, experience and improvement. This report will also signpost you towards additional information about Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust's performance..
On one day each month we check to see how many of our patients suffered certain types of harm whilst in our care. We call this the Safety Thermometer. The Safety Thermometer looks at four harms: pressure ulcers, falls, blood clots and urine infections for those patients who have a urinary catheter in place. This helps us to understand where we need to make improvements. The score below shows the percentage of patients who did not experience any new harms.
97.8% of patients did not experience any of the four harms.
For more information, including a breakdown by category, please visit:
HCAIs are infections acquired as a result of healthcare interventions. Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia are the most common. C.difficile is a type of bacterial infection that can affect the digestive system, causing diarrhoea, fever and painful abdominal cramps - and sometimes more serious complications. The bacteria does not normally affect healthy people, but because some antibiotics remove the 'good bacteria' in the gut that protect against C.difficile, people on these antibiotics are at greater risk.
The MRSA bacteria is often carried on the skin and inside the nose and throat. It is a particular problem in hospitals because if it gets into a break in the skin it can cause serious infections and blood poisoning. It is also more difficult to treat than other bacterial infections as it is resistant to a number of widely-used antibiotics.
We have a zero tolerance policy to infections and are working towards eradicating them. If the number of actual cases is greater than the target then we have not improved enough. The table below shows the number of infections we have had this month and results for the year to date.
The rigorous Root Cause Analysis is in place to determine whether a ‘ lapse in care’ occurred for the 2 Cdifficile cases during the month of December and as a result this number may be subject to change.
|Improvement target (year to date)||46||0|
|Actual to date||28||4|
Pressure ulcers are localised injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue as a result of pressure. They are sometimes known as bedsores. They can be classified into four grades, with one being the least severe and four being the most severe.
This month 11 pressure ulcers were acquired during hospital stays.
|Severity||Number of pressure ulcers|
The pressure ulcer numbers include all pressure ulcers that occurred from 72 hours after admission to this Trust
So we can know if we are improving even if the number of patients we are caring for goes up or down, we also calculate an average called 'rate per 1,000 occupied bed days'. This allows us to compare our improvement over time, but cannot be used to compare us with other hospitals, as their staff may report pressure ulcers in different ways, and their patients may be more or less vulnerable to developing pressure ulcers than our patients. For example, other hospitals may have younger or older patient populations, who are more or less mobile, or are undergoing treatment for different illnesses.
|Rate per 1000 bed days: 0.90|
This measure includes all falls in the hospital that resulted in injury, categorised as moderate, severe or death, regardless of cause. This includes avoidable and unavoidable falls sustained at any time during the hospital admission.
This month we reported 1 falls that caused at least 'moderate' harm.
|Severity||Number of falls|
So we can know if we are improving even if the number of patients we are caring for goes up or down, we also calculate an average called 'rate per 1,000 occupied bed days'. This allows us to compare our improvement over time, but cannot be used to compare us with other hospitals, as their staff may report falls in different ways, and their patients may be more or less vulnerable to falling than our patients. For example, other hospitals may have younger or older patient populations, who are more or less mobile, or are undergoing treatment for different illnesses.
|Rate per 1,000 bed days: 0.08|
To measure patient and staff experience we ask a number of questions.The idea is simple: if you like using a certain product or doing business with a particular company you like to share this experience with others.
The answers given are used to give a score which is the percentage of patients who responded that they would recommend our service to their friends and family.
The Friends and Family Test requires all patients, after discharge, to be asked: How likely are you to recommend our ward to friends and family if they needed similar care or treatment? We ask this question to patients who have been an in-patient or attended A&E (if applicable) in our Trust.
The In-patient FFT score: 96.9% for the Friends and Family test*. This is based on 1076 responses
A&E FFT score: 87.1%for the Friends and Family test*. This is based on 1121 responses
*This result may have changed since publication, for the latest score please visit:
We also asked 24 patients the following questions about their care:
|Were you involved as much as you wanted to be in the decisions about your care and treatment?||88|
|If you were concerned or anxious about anything while you were in hospital, did you find a member of staff to talk to?||100|
|Were you given enough privacy when discussing your condition or treatment?||100|
|During your stay were you treated with compassion by hospital staff?||92|
|Did you always have access to the call bell when you needed it?||96|
|Did you get the care you felt you required when you needed it most?||95|
|How likely are you to recommend our ward/unit to friends and family if they needed similar care or treatment?||100|
Our patient stories are important to us and we believe that feedback - both positive and negative - is essential to improving the care received by the patients and their families.
We asked 27 staff the following questions:
|Net Promoter Scores|
|I would recommend this ward/unit as a place to work||93|
|I would recommend the standard of care on this ward/unit to a friend or relative if they needed treatment||93|
|I am satisfied with the quality of care I give to the patients, carers and their families||96|
Guidelines produced by the National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE) make recommendations to ensure safe staffing levels on adult wards in acute hospitals and maternity settings. In-line with this guidance we are required to publish monthly reports showing the number of Registered Nurses/Midwives and Health Care Assistants (Care Staff) working on our in- patient wards.
Each month the data compares the number of staff hours ‘Planned’ against the number of staff hours used ‘Actual’. This is collected by ward, by shift, and is reported by calendar month as a % fill rate by day and by night.
An overview of Tameside hospitals current position is given below:
To view our detailed reports, which provide a breakdown by ward and to access the monthly Trust Board Reports relating to Safer Staffing information at Tameside, please use the link below:
Improvement story: We are listening to our patients and making changes
Nutrition Nurse of the Year 2017 awards
Our specialist Nutrition Nurse, Natalie Welsh, was selected for the finals of the Nutrition Nurse of the Year 2017 awards held in London.
Natalie has contributed to nutrition nursing in such a way that it has changed the culture of our organisation. She has made it her mission to ensure that nutrition is a key element of every patient’s treatment plan, and her continued tenacity means good quality nutritional care is the rule and the not the exception.
Natalie finished in third place in the process, notwithstanding that to be in the final of such a prestigious competition is a major achievement in itself and recognises Natalie’s contribution to the nutrition of patients in the hospital setting.
Natalie is a fantastic role model for new and existing nursing staff, and her simple, down to earth, practical approach has won her respect across the Trust and has encouraged a new way of thinking across the hospital, with our patients, carers and staff benefiting enormously from her expertise and knowledge around nutrition-related issues.